Page 1 of 5
nathan waller why is he a forgotten man
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2016 11:47 pm
by Mueddie28
nathan waller
batting and fielding averages
Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SR 100 50 4s 6s Ct St
First-class 21 36 4 772 115 24.12 1147 67.30 1 5 73 31 10 0
List A 28 22 1 334 55 15.90 475 70.31 0 1 23 14 6 0
Twenty20 22 17 3 159 24 11.35 118 134.74 0 0 5 13 5 0
Bowling averages
Mat Inns Balls Runs Wkts BBI BBM Ave Econ SR 4w 5w 10
First-class 21 29 2196 1061 38 3/18 5/40 27.92 2.89 57.7 0 0 0
List A 28 18 762 512 28 5/63 5/63 18.28 4.03 27.2 0 1 0
Twenty20 22 17 306 357 13 3/8 3/8 27.46 7.00 23.5 0 0 0
Re: nathan waller why is he a forgotten man
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2016 12:09 am
by sloandog
Doesn't bowl anymore; was always only a handy batter rather than a dangerous one.
Was only ever going to make the side as an allrounder, probably only in the limited over games
Re: nathan waller why is he a forgotten man
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2016 3:20 am
by eugene
Get him in the team!
Re: nathan waller why is he a forgotten man
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2016 4:21 am
by AngusBeef
Same stats except actually readable:
BATTING & FIELDING STATS:
Code: Select all
Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SR 100 50 4s 6s Ct St
FC 21 36 4 772 115 24.12 1147 67.3 1 5 73 31 10 0
LA 28 22 1 334 55 15.90 475 70.31 0 1 23 14 6 0
T20 22 17 3 159 24 11.35 118 134.74 0 0 5 13 5 0
Code: Select all
Mat Inns Balls Runs Wkts BBI BBM Ave Econ SR 4w 5w 10w
FA 21 29 2196 1061 38 3/18 5/40 27.92 2.89 57.7 0 0 0
LA 28 18 762 512 28 5/63 5/63 18.28 4.03 27.2 0 1 0
T20 22 17 306 357 13 3/8 3/8 27.46 7.00 23.5 0 0 0
Re: nathan waller why is he a forgotten man
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2016 5:16 am
by CrimsonAvenger
Which basically means he is useless as of now. And he is not bowling these days. Marumaesque.
Re: nathan waller why is he a forgotten man
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2016 8:42 am
by aydee
He was a decent prospect as a bowling allrounder. Not so much as a specialist batsman. That said, he has contributed well for the Eagles in the 2nd half of their Logan Cup campaign, and he is a prolific 6 hitter.
Re: nathan waller why is he a forgotten man
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2016 9:02 am
by gargamel
Waller is basically RUBBISH dosent bowl dosnt bat long innings can only slog not an athletic fielder, not a great team mate, a great big baby who needs diapers when not selected. very arrogant and thinks he should be captain with no leadership skills. Oh and i shake my head at why they even bothered let him back into the FC system after his failed attempt to migrate to Ireland he should just bloody bugger back to Ireland and run a pub
Re: nathan waller why is he a forgotten man
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2016 9:09 am
by ZIMDOGGY
gargamel wrote:Waller is basically RUBBISH dosent bowl dosnt bat long innings can only slog not an athletic fielder, not a great team mate, a great big baby who needs diapers when selected. very arrogant and thinks he should be captain with no leadership skills. Oh and i shake my head at why they even bothered let him back into the FC system after his failed attempt to migrate to Ireland he should just bloody bugger back to Ireland and run a pub
savage!
Re: nathan waller why is he a forgotten man
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2016 9:26 am
by aydee
gargamel wrote:Waller is basically RUBBISH dosent bowl dosnt bat long innings can only slog not an athletic fielder, not a great team mate, a great big baby who needs diapers when not selected. very arrogant and thinks he should be captain with no leadership skills. Oh and i shake my head at why they even bothered let him back into the FC system after his failed attempt to migrate to Ireland he should just bloody bugger back to Ireland and run a pub
Ignoring all the personality related stuff, which I am in no position to comment on... He has 218 runs in 6 Logan Cup innings. Averaging 37 with 3 50s, and 14 6s (!!). This too for a side who appear on course to win the title at the moment. "Rubbish" would appear to be wide of the mark.
Re: nathan waller why is he a forgotten man
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2016 9:40 am
by gargamel
The scores are against lesser attacks and if he wants to be a good cricketer to play for Zimbabwe he needs to suck up the pain and bloody bowl and bat for hundresds if you had said he scored 3 Logan cup hundreds yes i would now call him average but he must be lumped with the average bunch of players collecting USD800 monthly checks. The truth of the matter is that Nathan is quite far if not even a dream away from the selectors minds like a lot of players. The gap between the Franchise and National team is huge case in point Slugs double hundred last week and Chakabvas back to back hundreds thats the standard i expect.