zimcricketforums.com

i think so.

Definetly they are equals infact Kenya has a better rugby team, but you put this in the wrong forum try www.zimrugbyforums.com

Idiotic thread

Well, let's give Jamthala a chance: given in the last few series they've played, Zimbabwe have been head-and-shoulders above Kenya (who are arguably in decline at the moment), what makes you think that we're only as good as they are? Specifics, please...!

maehara wrote:Well, let's give Jamthala a chance: given in the last few series they've played, Zimbabwe have been head-and-shoulders above Kenya (who are arguably in decline at the moment), what makes you think that we're only as good as they are? Specifics, please...!

And Zim have improved since then...

I think idiotic thread was pretty much spot on...

I have to say Jamthala, it's a poor thread dude.
Kenya are an ageing side, and in all honesty they have a lack of fast bowlers and quality ODI batters.
Tikolo, who turns 40 soon, is their best batter, and i'll give him 3 months until he says goodbye to international cricket.

This is a poor thread. Kenya are a team in decline. Their best players are old and the they have very few quality young players. Kenya are no longer even the best associate. To claim they are as good as Zimbabwe is ludicrous.

ok i will do comparison player by player

kenya have
david obuya[67 m 19.71 bat avg) and alex obanda[37 m 34.18 bat avg]

there is no big difference between alex obanda and taylor [112 m 32.42 bat avg] battting average.

sibanda [83 m 21.45 bat avg] so david obuya.

so there is not much difference in openers batting average.

im sorry jamathala, but for one sinbanda isnt opening for zim at the moment. And kenya play mostly associates so there averages would be up but still Zims players are higher, well most are.Finally does kenya have anyone of prices ability in the bowling department.

and this isnt a great example but still an example of zims dominancehttp://www.espncricinfo.com/icccont2010 ... 24848.html