Feel free to call my logic shit. Thats the beauty of opinion. I only expressed that you just claimed that there are better BLACK players. You singled out a race rather than chose to pick players on a general form basis regardless of race.Conant wrote:
Zimbos5, I could call your logic shit too but don't worry, I am civilised
The thing is, ZC has a history of being tyrannical, misleading, biased, and quite frankly administering the game without the interests of the greater good of the game. They have always played the race card, and been quite happy to see the game suffer as long as they get their way.
jimmy has just said he is a non white who is in on the inner workings of the game. I have nothing against jimmy. To be honest, he seems like a decent guy, and if i got to know him personally id probably get along, but lets be honest here, ZC for the last few years has shown that anybody who says otherwise is ousted. Why would jimmy be allowed in on the inner side of things if he didn't tow the line or speak in ZCs best interest? I have been in sport for too long to know that no player just lashes out. Any manager with a history of mistreatment towards his players is bound to raise suspicion when the question of a player conflict arises. ZC do not have the record that tells me that they are doing anything for the games greater good in the country.
The race card will always be played, and as long as that happens, the game will never move forward. We will always be underachievers, and whipping boys, who maybe pull off the odd win, but then are also susceptible to losses at the hands of minnows, and embarrassment on a regular basis. At the moment, it is Mangongos word against Sean. Quite frankly, nothing suggests that Mangongo would be the more trustworthy and honest party. His history speaks against him, and although jimmy seems to back him up, the history of ZC speaks against that too.
And for the record, my links to zim cricket, I was born in Zim.
