That's the correct answer, alan 132.alan132 wrote:India won by 3 runs. I remember watching the Zim innings on TV. It certainly brightened a cold winter's morning in the UK! At one stage it appeared that Zim had no chance, but then Carlisle and Ervine began to get going and the Indians started to worry. Unfortunately Ervine got out after getting his century and Heath Streak was just unable to take Zim home.
I watched the full telecast of this match. I started to follow Zimbabwean cricket team more after watching this match. I think Zim showed a good fighting spirit in this VB series. The squad was also very strong although that had Sibanda and Matsikenyeri also. I thought Zimbabwe was back again so did Heath Streak, then skipper. At that point of time, they suffered the loss of some players likes of Goodwin, A Flower, Olonga, P Strang, Murphy. But the good days didn't last very long. Bangladesh series was after this, and after that came the rebel strike and we know the whole story after that till now.
Here is the scorecard of this match:
http://www.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/65650.html
In the last over Zimbabwe needed 9 runs but Streak, Blignaut and Ebrahim weren't able to reach that mark...
In fact, in the VB series Zimbabwe played 3 close matches including this.
End of over 49 (11 runs) Zimbabwe 272/5 (9 runs required from 6 balls, RR: 5.55, RRR: 9.00) HH Streak 4* (3b 1x4) IK Pathan 10-0-47-0
AM Blignaut 10* (10b 1x4) AB Agarkar 10.1-0-39-3
49.1
Bangar to Blignaut, 2 runs
49.2
Bangar to Blignaut, no run
49.3
Bangar to Blignaut, OUT
AM Blignaut c Laxman b Bangar 12 (19m 13b 1x4 0x6) SR: 92.30
49.4
Bangar to Streak, no run
49.5
Bangar to Streak, 1 run
49.6
Bangar to Ebrahim, 2 runs
End of over 50 (5 runs) Zimbabwe 277/6 (4 runs required from 0 balls, RR: 5.54) DD Ebrahim 2* (1b) SB Bangar 8-0-42-1
HH Streak 5* (5b 1x4) IK Pathan 10-0-47-0
One against India (lost by 24 runs)
http://www.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/curre ... 65648.html
(This was the match where Mark Vermeulen was hit in the head by Irfan Pathan. He was not out on 14. So, Zim was actually 9 wickets down)
AND
another against Australia (lost by 13 runs)
http://www.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/curre ... 65651.html.
Now, alan 132, it's your chance to ask a question.