[Match Thread] Zimbabwe vs New Zealand (2nd ODI)

Participate in discussion with your fellow Zimbabwe cricket fans!
Jemisi
Posts: 9254
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 8:04 am
Supports: Southern Rocks

Re: [Match Thread] Zimbabwe vs New Zealand (2nd ODI)

Post by Jemisi »

The Taylor bashing is off the mark. No one else passed 42. No one other than Waller passed 20. Whilst Meth was going, BRMT was giving him the strike. A few misses going for the landmark and the finish, I grant, but a very well judged and professional innings. Hardly "very selfish", gargamel.

Jemisi
Posts: 9254
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 8:04 am
Supports: Southern Rocks

Re: [Match Thread] Zimbabwe vs New Zealand (2nd ODI)

Post by Jemisi »

107 off 105, obviously a bloke taking no risks and playing for himself :?

User avatar
brmtaylor.com admin
Administrator
Posts: 7940
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2007 3:22 pm
Contact:

Re: [Match Thread] Zimbabwe vs New Zealand (2nd ODI)

Post by brmtaylor.com admin »

Yeah I agree Jemisi. While it would have been nice for him to crunch a couple more boundaries you can't lose sight of the fact that he did score an unbeaten century at better than a run a ball. It was a very good innings.

User avatar
eugene
Posts: 7826
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 11:31 pm
Supports: Matabeleland Tuskers

Re: [Match Thread] Zimbabwe vs New Zealand (2nd ODI)

Post by eugene »

Jemisi wrote:107 off 105, obviously a bloke taking no risks and playing for himself :?
Haha.
Neil Johnson, Alistair Campbell, Murray Goodwin, Andy Flower (w), Grant Flower, Dave Houghton, Guy Whittall, Heath Streak (c), Andy Blignaut, Ray Price, Eddo Brandes

Conant
Posts: 1528
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 9:46 am
Supports: Matabeleland Tuskers
Location: Benoni, South Africa
Contact:

Re: [Match Thread] Zimbabwe vs New Zealand (2nd ODI)

Post by Conant »

Jemisi wrote:The Taylor bashing is off the mark. No one else passed 42. No one other than Waller passed 20. Whilst Meth was going, BRMT was giving him the strike. A few misses going for the landmark and the finish, I grant, but a very well judged and professional innings. Hardly "very selfish", gargamel.
Parhaps slightly off the mark, I dont know. But equally, Taylor worshipping is doe-eyed, especially when you slip in that "nobody else passed 42". Sounds very much like those ZanuPF chaps and Bob.

Now that he's captain, more than anything elkse is when he needs to be bolder and make the kind of decisions he was lauded for against Bangladesh. Playing for a win that could very much have been possible by a bigger percentage now, not another slight mark to his stats and 2 points higher on his average

User avatar
brmtaylor.com admin
Administrator
Posts: 7940
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2007 3:22 pm
Contact:

Re: [Match Thread] Zimbabwe vs New Zealand (2nd ODI)

Post by brmtaylor.com admin »

I'm not sure why Mpofu is bowling it so short. He and Jarvis were guilty of it in the last match as well.
Much better off bowling it full and straight (or on leg) than short and wide. At least you can set a field for that.

Case in point, Meth bowls it full and almost gets an LBW...

Jemisi
Posts: 9254
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 8:04 am
Supports: Southern Rocks

Re: [Match Thread] Zimbabwe vs New Zealand (2nd ODI)

Post by Jemisi »

Conant wrote:
Jemisi wrote:The Taylor bashing is off the mark. No one else passed 42. No one other than Waller passed 20. Whilst Meth was going, BRMT was giving him the strike. A few misses going for the landmark and the finish, I grant, but a very well judged and professional innings. Hardly "very selfish", gargamel.
Parhaps slightly off the mark, I dont know. But equally, Taylor worshipping is doe-eyed, especially when you slip in that "nobody else passed 42". Sounds very much like those ZanuPF chaps and Bob.

Now that he's captain, more than anything elkse is when he needs to be bolder and make the kind of decisions he was lauded for against Bangladesh. Playing for a win that could very much have been possible by a bigger percentage now, not another slight mark to his stats and 2 points higher on his average
If Taylor had scored 43 off 70 and I'd said nobody else passed 42, my comments may indeed have resembled the nonsense that comes from some quarters in Zim. But he scored 107* off 105. 250% of Waller's score and 500%+ of Meth and Hami's contributions. Fair go mate.

User avatar
brmtaylor.com admin
Administrator
Posts: 7940
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2007 3:22 pm
Contact:

Re: [Match Thread] Zimbabwe vs New Zealand (2nd ODI)

Post by brmtaylor.com admin »

Seriously, what on earth does Zimbabwe have to do to get an LBW decision? Unbelievable.

User avatar
Flower power
Posts: 934
Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 7:05 pm
Supports: Mountaineers
Location: Mutare

Re: [Match Thread] Zimbabwe vs New Zealand (2nd ODI)

Post by Flower power »

brmtaylor.com admin wrote:Seriously, what on earth does Zimbabwe have to do to get an LBW decision? Unbelievable.
reviews

User avatar
Flower power
Posts: 934
Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 7:05 pm
Supports: Mountaineers
Location: Mutare

Re: [Match Thread] Zimbabwe vs New Zealand (2nd ODI)

Post by Flower power »

Meth comes to the party :W:

Post Reply