Boxing Day Test: SA v ZIM - Day 1 Review

Participate in discussion with your fellow Zimbabwe cricket fans!
pariah
Posts: 1490
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2017 2:27 pm
Supports: Matabeleland Tuskers

Boxing Day Test: SA v ZIM - Day 1 Review

Post by pariah »

SA won the toss and elected to bat looking to bat once and bat ZIM out of the game.

Injuries kept Faf and Steyn out of the game as expected, while for ZIM Muzarabani played as coach Streak had indicated, with Burl an unexpected debut, but at least in the middle order(yet again continuing the selective trend long predicted).

What followed was a litany of errors from the Proteas on the way to an underwhelming but sufficient total. Cremer got Philander out beautifully, but otherwise the rest of the Proteas batsmen got themselves out needlessly.

Jarvis was horribly slow and ineffective, further proving why investment in him was grossly misguided and wasteful. Muzarabani benefitted from the watchful openers, but prove he was ways ell below the standard. Hard to be dropped going forward after fortuitously picking up Amla and AB's wckets, but Mpofu did nothing to suggest why he should have toured to begin with. Cremer was for the most part wayward, expensive and downright useless. Raza was firmly put in his place by proper batsmen - he's a non-spinner.

That Chamu Chibhabha was easily Zimbabwe's best bowler, and by quite some distance, underlined just how poor this Zimbabwe attack was, and how grateful ZIM should be for being let off the hook. His performance and multiple threatening deliveries further highliing what a big loss Panyangara's absence amounts to.

With the none-keeping and non-batting pair of Burl and Moor. you would have expected one of them to open alongside Chibhabha, or both of them open(considering Chamu bowled a lot and the all rounder should batmich lower), while ZIM's best test batsman Hami comes in lower after the sudden SA declaration. Common sense failed to prevail ahead of privilege. SA ripped through ZIM's top order with Morkel doing most of the damage. Hami gone first ball! What a waste!

ZIM's so-called best batting pair of Craig Ervine and Taylor getting out in quick succession for 5 and a duck respectively, after the openers fell. Signs were already there from the footwork-less pair against raw SA novices a few days earlier.

ZIM on 30/4 with Jarvis looking to make it 30/5 as soon as possible when play resumes. Moor and Raza to join Burl and hopefully make the most of the afternoon conditions.

With the SA seamers not lookingo gibe away any easy runs ZIM batsmen will either have to force the issue block their way into more evening and night trouble.

What is not in doubt is that SA would have faced a much stiffer challenge from any of the sides in its Franchise or Provincial competitions. An even more sad indictment being the fact that Namibia make up that list.

ZIM's effectively forced relegation to the I-Cup now, looks as relevant as the voluntary withdrawal from Tests about a decade ago. The suspiciously wide coverage perhaps an indication of the deliberate intention to prove that beyond reasonable doubt as opposed to interest and demand.

It will be a miracle if Day 2 isn't the final day of this Test match!

sloandog
Posts: 9934
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 11:28 am
Supports: MidWest Rhinos
Location: Manchester UK

Re: Boxing Day Test: SA v ZIM - Day 1 Review

Post by sloandog »

And now, you're gone.

Good riddance to the worst bloke I've come across on any social network. What an absolute racists pleb you've shown yourself to be.

Go and troll some other forum pal

User avatar
Andybligzz
Posts: 789
Joined: Sun Jul 23, 2017 3:07 am
Supports: MidWest Rhinos

Re: Boxing Day Test: SA v ZIM - Day 1 Review

Post by Andybligzz »

sloandog wrote:
Wed Dec 27, 2017 1:42 am
And now, you're gone.

Good riddance to the worst bloke I've come across on any social network. What an absolute racists pleb you've shown yourself to be.

Go and troll some other forum pal
+1 not only are you delusional and a complete prick you are a burden on this forum . Fully trying to bait people here ! Jarvis was our best bowler and is the best bowler in zim by a country mile. Good riddance pariah, And also Chamu did bowl well and was unlucky but he bowled at the same pace if not slower than Jarvis !!!! Here in Aus we like to call people like you a dickhead !
The Zimbabwe Cricket team have found Ebola in one of their members, but they're not concerned because they have also found Ebatsmen and Efielda!

PSR
Posts: 801
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 3:27 pm
Supports: MidWest Rhinos
Location: India

Re: Boxing Day Test: SA v ZIM - Day 1 Review

Post by PSR »

Seriously?? One of the worst reviews...Remove this bastard

User avatar
CrimsonAvenger
Posts: 9840
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 2:57 am
Supports: Mountaineers
Location: India

Re: Boxing Day Test: SA v ZIM - Day 1 Review

Post by CrimsonAvenger »

pariah wrote:
Wed Dec 27, 2017 1:35 am
That Chamu Chibhabha was easily Zimbabwe's best bowler, and by quite some distance, underlined just how poor this Zimbabwe attack was, and how grateful ZIM should be for being let off the hook. His performance and multiple threatening deliveries further highliing what a big loss Panyangara's absence amounts to.
:lol: :lol: :lol:

I wonder how 30/4 did not invoke Vusi though.

User avatar
eugene
Posts: 7761
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 11:31 pm
Supports: Matabeleland Tuskers

Re: Boxing Day Test: SA v ZIM - Day 1 Review

Post by eugene »

Was pariah even watching the same game? Perhaps the last accurate review of a day's play I have ever read.
Neil Johnson, Alistair Campbell, Murray Goodwin, Andy Flower (w), Grant Flower, Dave Houghton, Guy Whittall, Heath Streak (c), Andy Blignaut, Ray Price, Eddo Brandes

User avatar
Black Mamba
Posts: 996
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2017 4:55 am
Supports: Matabeleland Tuskers

Re: Boxing Day Test: SA v ZIM - Day 1 Review

Post by Black Mamba »

Zimbabwe & New Zealand were only two countries known to be producing talent allrounders. Kiwis had Cairns, Harris, Styris, Oram, Vittori whereas Zimbos had Ervine, Johnson, Whitall,Friend, Blignaut, Strang & Streak.

Both Countries are now struggling to produce quality allrounders. Kiwis have Anderson, Neesham, de Grandhomme not upto the mark, whereas Zimbos also are lacking quality in Chibhabha, Mire and Chigumburra.

TapsC
Posts: 2349
Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2015 2:54 am

Re: Boxing Day Test: SA v ZIM - Day 1 Review

Post by TapsC »

I actually think Chamu would make the perfect number 7 in tests if Taylor is keeping. he doesn't take his bowling seriously but he gets a lot of movement. the only way he can stay in this team is by continuing as an all rounder.

User avatar
Black Mamba
Posts: 996
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2017 4:55 am
Supports: Matabeleland Tuskers

Re: Boxing Day Test: SA v ZIM - Day 1 Review

Post by Black Mamba »

TapsC wrote:
Wed Dec 27, 2017 7:58 am
I actually think Chamu would make the perfect number 7 in tests if Taylor is keeping. he doesn't take his bowling seriously but he gets a lot of movement. the only way he can stay in this team is by continuing as an all rounder.

Just with scoring 6 runs and taking no wickets. Time to give
n.o 7 spot to Nathan Waller

User avatar
Andybligzz
Posts: 789
Joined: Sun Jul 23, 2017 3:07 am
Supports: MidWest Rhinos

Re: Boxing Day Test: SA v ZIM - Day 1 Review

Post by Andybligzz »

Black Mamba wrote:
Wed Dec 27, 2017 8:30 am
TapsC wrote:
Wed Dec 27, 2017 7:58 am
I actually think Chamu would make the perfect number 7 in tests if Taylor is keeping. he doesn't take his bowling seriously but he gets a lot of movement. the only way he can stay in this team is by continuing as an all rounder.

Just with scoring 6 runs and taking no wickets. Time to give
n.o 7 spot to Nathan Waller
I’d rather sir Andy Blignaut there at his current age or even a microwave , would at least be useful for the boys to warm their food up.
The Zimbabwe Cricket team have found Ebola in one of their members, but they're not concerned because they have also found Ebatsmen and Efielda!

Post Reply