foreignfield wrote: ↑Mon Jan 27, 2020 12:40 pm
I don't think any of the dismissals today--and not many in the other Test--were down to a particular defensive or aggressive mindset.
I disagree.
This is exactly why we lost.
Firstly. I don’t think we would have won, but we lost the chance of a draw.
Where we lost it, was exactly through the method I was describing in running commentary all throughout the match one thread.
As you can see from this test, there were/are ALOT of easy runs in offer.
This day will net us 350 minimum.
This is how we lost.
We didn’t take the easy runs on offer day one. We didn’t Harvest the runs and we starved later.
As we were 2/190 instead of 240, which we could have done safely, the runs weren’t there when we started to lose wickets. Which was likely and inevitable.
When the cards crumbled, we were all out cheaply despite batting for 2 days. Pressure was created on the lower order.
Let me stress, easy runs were not taken. I’m not advocating stupid shots, but we gave up easy runs that were there.
This has a fast forwarding effect on the test match. It means Sri Lanka has less runs to exceed, and exceed they did by taking the runs (still) on offer.
Made it hard for us when the pitch died a bit and we crumbled.
The coaching staff obviously agree with me, as there’s clearly a directive to cash in today to avoid it.
Ultimately, I can’t blame a guy on debut and Another virtually on debut. It was a selection failure, two nervous guys and that’s how they dealt with it.
This is why if they wanted to debut Kasuza, it would have made more sense having Moor, Burl, Regis on the other end to provide some emotional leadership. They were like chickens out at sea, and they did the best they can under that personally nervous pressure.