Cribbage wrote:I still don't think he's a number three by any stretch of the imagination on anything other than complete roads. He's not anywhere near good enough against the quicks for that; I'm sure we'll find this out the hard way. That said, he's proven here that he deserves a run in the side.
Not no.3 as thats Williams place but he is great as opener, no.4 or slogger at end overs. The fact is he can build inn so first two options for me.
here's the 66666666666
Zim Rules
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dr Satendra Singh, Delhi, India
Twitter: @drsitu
Surprises Carlisle's 121, next target Campbell's 131
Zim Rules
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dr Satendra Singh, Delhi, India
Twitter: @drsitu
Cribbage wrote:I still don't think he's a number three by any stretch of the imagination on anything other than complete roads. He's not anywhere near good enough against the quicks for that; I'm sure we'll find this out the hard way. That said, he's proven here that he deserves a run in the side.
compared to the over options he is the best we have
In the team? Sure.
At three? I do not agree. I'd much rather see Taylor, Williams or (eventually) Taibu batting there. It's fine to bat him there in this series because the Bangladesh pace attack is neither good not plentiful and the pitches are essentially not fit for cricket, but his technique against the quicks would make him a sitting duck at three in most circumstances.
I'm not trying to take anything away from the innings as such; it has been excellent. I just think people need to calm down and take it into perspective before claiming we've found our #3. I think what we've found is our #6.
I see your point and defintly in the longer form of the game he should not bad at 3 but on a good pitch i think he can defintly do the role. Williams has always been my chocie to have at 3 but seems like the coaching staff and the player himself would rather bat at 4 or 5.
1 Craig Wishart 172*
2 Andy Flower 145
3 Grant Flower 142*
4 Andy Flower 142*
5 Dave Houghton 142
6 Grant Flower 140
7 Neil Johnson 132*
8 Alistair Campbell 131*
9 Charles Coventry 129*
10 Alistair Campbell 124
Zim Rules
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dr Satendra Singh, Delhi, India
Twitter: @drsitu