Does the ICC cover the bills when someone is reported for a suspect action on the international stage?lange22 wrote:This doesn't make sense to me:
The University of WA in Perth are world leaders in this field and gave Murali's action the all clear in the 2000s after the rules were changed. He had the video analysis with the wires and computer monitoring when he was bowling. How hard would it be to organise this? Surely it would justify the cost, we're talking about a front line bowler for an international team.“He has to undergo tests, but unfortunately there is no one qualified for that in Zim. It’s not a simple thing. You need to go to a sports science institution and gets analysed. It a decision that affects a career, so you got to do it properly.”
There was some talk about Querl being cleared in England, did that involve testing? But even if got the all-clear from say Loughborough University I'm afraid the ICC and the ECB seem to be at loggerheads about testing methods (read about that somewhere a while ago).