[Match Thread] Logan Cup & Pro50: Tuskers v Rocks
-
jimmylesaint
- Posts: 791
- Joined: Sun Feb 02, 2014 12:51 pm
- Supports: Mashonaland Eagles
Re: [Match Thread] Logan Cup & Pro50: Tuskers v Rocks
Unlucky Tuskers, suffered an injury and had one less batsman. Stupid rules. Gave Rocks too many runs and did some silly running but would have prevailed if 11batsmen.
-
totoro
- Posts: 735
- Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2011 1:00 am
- Supports: Matabeleland Tuskers
- Location: Hamilton, Vic
Re: [Match Thread] Logan Cup & Pro50: Tuskers v Rocks
Who was injured?jimmylesaint wrote:Unlucky Tuskers, suffered an injury and had one less batsman. Stupid rules. Gave Rocks too many runs and did some silly running but would have prevailed if 11batsmen.
-
CrimsonAvenger
- Posts: 9840
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 2:57 am
- Supports: Mountaineers
- Location: India
Re: [Match Thread] Logan Cup & Pro50: Tuskers v Rocks
Thabo Mboyi got injured and did not bat. He bowled a solitary over too. That meant a lot of overs bowled by the Tuskers part timers GATM and Chari. This did not help as well, in the scheme of things. Tuskers could not go for the kill when they bowled as well.
Having said that, Mupariwa and Chimhamhiwa should have cleaned up the tail, not sure why the skipper continued to bowl the spinners all the way till the end.
Having said that, Mupariwa and Chimhamhiwa should have cleaned up the tail, not sure why the skipper continued to bowl the spinners all the way till the end.
Re: [Match Thread] Logan Cup & Pro50: Tuskers v Rocks
Go Rocks, 9 bowlers! some consolation after the Logan Cup disappointment.